As China threat rises, can Aukus alliance recover from rancorous birth?

- Advertisement -

IThe T was initially seen by Australia’s Joe Biden as an audacious recruit in the 21st century struggle against China, elevating the country to an important regional military power in the process, and eventually to global Britain and Indo-China. Its tilt was given for the Pacific.

- Advertisement -

But since then the “uproar” about the Ocus, as Boris Johnson describes it, hasn’t stopped. If this was the start of a new “anti-hegemonic coalition” to balance China’s rise, it may not have cracked on the launchpad at all, but neither has it proceeded as smoothly as it was intended.


At the center of the matter is Australia’s announcement that it was abandoning its A$90bn (£48.5bn) “deal of the century” contract to buy 12 diesel-powered submarines from France, and instead eight nuclear ones from the US. – was buying powered submarines. and Britain.

The dual concept of Aukas has angered France, once Australia’s 30-year trusted partner in the Indo-Pacific, and requires an apology from Biden that raises worrying questions about how his administration operates internally. it happens.

- Advertisement -

More importantly, as the contract was announced with such fanfare on 16 September, questions remain as to the ultimate objective of the alliance and its implications for other countries in the Southeast Asia-based ASEAN bloc. grow about.

The risk is that Aukas, far from consolidating a regional alliance against China, leads to fractures, with big players such as Indonesia, Malaysia, New Zealand and India upset by the arrival of a new inner anglosphere core in their region. The concern is that it subtracts rather than adds. It has also raised legitimate questions among Pacific countries and think tanks about the nuclear arms race and loopholes in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Some of those concerns have been echoed by Rafael Grossi, the head of the UN Weapons Inspectorate, as well as the UN General Assembly.

Emmanuel Macron (second left) and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull (C) stand on the deck of the Collins-class submarine HMAS Waller operated by the Royal Australian Navy in Garden Island, Sydney in May 2018. Photograph: Brendan Esposito/AFP/Getty Images

a boost for macros

There has also been a debate in Europe regarding this. Emmanuel Macron’s plan to use the French presidency of the European Union next year has been boosted by resumption of proposals for stronger European defence. Embarrassed by his betrayal of France, Biden has extended his broad support to Macron’s plans.

Macron has been able to argue that if the Ocus was about anything, it was a sign that America’s geo-strategic center of gravity is moving east from Europe to counter Chinese expansionism. This in turn underscored how the old Eurocentric Western security architecture is essentially messed up, and needs reform, allowing Paris to snatch a potential victory in Europe from the ashes of its humiliation in the Indo-Pacific.

Eventually the European Union, not only Paris, was not affected by the Aukus, having suspended free trade talks with Canberra. EU special envoy for the Indo-Pacific Gabriele Vicentin acknowledged that many saw it as not intentional but inept, launching the Ocus on the day the EU published its strategy for the Indo-Pacific. it was done. Regardless of the timing, EU defense ministers are moving ahead at a brisk pace with their plans for stronger European defense, including the creation of a 5,000-strong Joint Military Intervention Force by 2025.

Personal reputation may also get hurt. French intelligence and diplomats are facing questions as to why they haven’t caught Australia’s months-long deception. But Kurt Campbell, the director of White House Asia and the main advocate of a plan to share America’s nuclear secrets with Australia, does not favor the State Department, where many say it would have happened if Campbell had told Australia to stop. It would have been more surprising. For 3 to 6 months after the cancellation of the French contract before the new security agreement is announced.

Australian and American flags are seen during a meeting between Scott Morrison and Lloyd Austin at the Pentagon on 22 September 2021.
Australian and American flags are seen during a meeting between Scott Morrison and Lloyd Austin at the Pentagon on 22 September 2021. Photograph: Drew Enger / Getty Images

australian angle

With inquiries in four national legislatures, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison seems less likely to emerge with a heightened reputation for plain demeanor and diplomatic horizon scanning expertise.

Biden himself has not recovered from this. Having said that he thought France had been informed of the loss of the submarine contract, he looks like a man who would either attempt to salvage his alliance with that country, or be out of the loop. . Asked at an Aspen security forum whether it was credible that Biden didn’t know, the normally polite French ambassador to Washington, Philippe tienne, paused awkwardly before saying it was important to look to the future.

Johnson’s authenticity is also on trend. Questions remain, at least in French minds, about the exact role played by UK officials in agitating for this decision, which has caused Australia $2.4 billion in damages, with further compensation. Morrison’s advisory panel since February this year had senior British figures, most notably Murray Easton, the former head of BAE Systems Submarine, who is credited with transforming the British nuclear submarine programme.

But one difficulty for the Ocus is that it is largely a concept. A phalanx of recently hired former US naval advisers has been appointed by Morrison to fill out the details over the next 18 months on which submarines will be built. It is intended to show Australia, a country with no civilian nuclear base, can co-produce new submarines, either the British-designed Astute, or the Virginia class sub built in Connecticut or Virginia.

Whatever the option, there will be no Australian nuclear-powered subs in the South China Sea until 2040, by which time Taiwan’s fate could be sealed. The first French submarine was by contrast to be ready by 2034, meaning Australia’s aging Collins class would have to be refitted, or some interim solution would be found. Jean-Pierre Thébault, the French ambassador to Australia, left no stone unturned to point out the uncertainties of a “giant leap into the unknown”. He added: “No magical thinking could have escaped the fact that Australia now had a capacity gap”.

Ocas Treaty: UK and US fight to halt international backlash

French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said: “Australians place themselves entirely at the mercy of US policy developments. I want our Australian partner, who chose security – justified by escalating tensions with China – To the detriment of sovereignty, it will not be known later that he has sacrificed both.”

The other selling point of the Ocus security pact – in-depth cooperation on cyber, artificial intelligence and quantum computing – is also coming under scrutiny. Morrison is keen to show that this is not a PR add-on, but a solid move. If so, it may surprise technologically advanced allies such as Japan and South Korea with their exclusion. The US had previously rejected South Korea’s request to share its nuclear propulsion technology.

This does not mean that the Ocus, no matter how hard the pains of birth, lack military logic or political support. It was legitimate for Australia, faced with China’s trade war and threats to Taiwan, to decide that its strategic needs were changing, and that France was never going to satisfy them. It wanted something that could travel great distances. It is approximately 3,500 miles from the Rann Operating Base in Perth to the South China Sea. Australia was attracted by the fact that American technology meant the nuclear reactor in the submarine would not require replacement or additional nuclear fuel over the course of decades of service. This was a significant difference with the French model. Australia would not need a large civil nuclear industry to maintain the ship.

But it also means a major shift in how Australia views the extent of its influence. “It is about pushing power to shape the security environment in which we operate,” said Arthur Sinodino, the Australian ambassador to Washington. “Working together you can change the count of countries in the region who may think that once they become a great power they can throw their weight around, and don’t have to follow any rules. Is.”

‘From order to international chaos’

France does not completely disagree with the nature of the threat from China. The Chief of Staff of the French Navy, Admiral Pierre Vandier, told France’s parliament in October: “We are in the process of moving violently, from order to international disorder. The sea is once again in the spotlight. The place common to all humanity, sometimes in defiance of agreements and alliances, has become a place, superiority, a place of competition, challenge, conflict – or disagreement, for states and organizations willing to assert themselves.

“We are watching the Chinese naval awakening. The size of the Chinese Navy increased by 138% between 2008 and 2030. My predecessor estimated that China launches the equivalent of our national fleet every four years. Ordinary Chinese Coast Guard patrol boats are actually real first class warships. They are 10,000 ton boats – they are bigger than our similar sized warships – armed with cannons. Their mission is to save the fishing fleet and even its navies have been authorized to open fire since the amendment of the law. ,

Pierre Vandier
Pierre Vandier: ‘… the sea, the common space for all humanity, has become a place for states and organizations … Photo: Patrice Copi/AFP/Getty Images

Despite France’s betrayal, Vandier also warned that it would be an error for France to mistake its true enemy.

He said: “I invite you to re-read General Day …

- Advertisement -
Mail Us For  DMCA / Credit  Notice

Recent Articles

Stay on top - Get the daily news in your inbox

Related Stories