Biden Bars Trump from Receiving Intelligence Briefing, Citing ‘Erratic Behavior’

    Business Inquiry

    Publish your article/ads on our website

    WASHINGTON – President Biden said on Friday that he would hold his predecessor, Donald J. Trump would be barred from conducting intelligence briefings from traditional briefings given to the former president, adding that Mr. Trump cannot be trusted before January because of his “erratic behavior”. 6 attacks on the Capitol.

    The move was the first time that a former president had been excluded from the briefing, which is partly provided as a courtesy and partly for the moments when a sitting president reaches out for advice. Currently, briefings are given regularly to Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama.

    Mr. Biden, speaking to Nora O’Donnell of CBS News, said Mr. Trump’s behavior worried him “unrelated to the rebellion,” which led to Mr. Trump’s second impeachment.

    “I just think that he has no need for an intelligence briefing,” Mr. Biden said.

    “Is Price giving her an intelligence briefing?” Mr. Biden added. “What effect does he have, other than the fact that he can slip and say something?”

    The White House said this week that it is reviewing that the former president, whose impeachment trial in the Senate begins Tuesday, should receive the briefing. Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam B. Schiff said last month, just before Mr. Biden’s inauguration, that Mr. Trump’s access to any classified information should be cut.

    “There is no situation in which this president should get another intelligence briefing, not now and not in the future,” said Mr. Schiff, a California Democrat who was the house manager for Mr. Trump’s first impeachment trial a year ago.

    Mr. Schiff said, “In fact, I think all the intelligence partners around the world who probably started withdrawing information from us because they didn’t believe the president would keep that information safe and their sources and methods Will protect. ” “And it makes us less safe. We have seen this president’s intelligence being politicized, and this is another risk for the country. “

    Mr. Trump picked up intelligence several times during his presidency. In 2017 FBI Director James B. Soon after Komi was fired, Mr. Trump informed the Russian foreign minister and the Russian ambassador of a high-level intelligence about the Islamic State from Israel. The Israelis resented.

    Later in his chairmanship, Mr. Trump took a photo with his phone of a classified satellite image showing an explosion on a missile launchpad in Iran. Some of the markings had previously been blackened, but the revelation gave unfavorable information – which they might have, anyway – about the capabilities of American surveillance satellites.

    There were other examples, and Mr Trump’s aides later said that because he refused to read intelligence reports – prioritizing a verbal briefing – he did not see the “secret” and “(U)” markings that ” Secret “and” hint “unclassified

    But there was deep concern about how Mr Trump could use intelligence now that he has retreated to his club Mar-a-Lago in Florida. The former president has spoken openly about the possibility of running again for the White House, perhaps under the banner of a third party. The fear was that he would use intelligence to fit his political agenda, or bend over, something he was often charged with in office.

    Among those arguing to cut Mr. Trump’s reach, Susan M., a career CIA officer. There was Gordon, who served as deputy director of the National Intelligence Department until 2019, when he left after passing for director.

    In an opinion article in the Washington Post in January, Ms. Gordon, one of the most respected intelligence officers of her generation, wrote that the threat of providing intelligence to a president whose business dealings might be beholden to foreign investors and lenders great too. Ms. Gordon often briefed Mr. Trump.

    “His post-White House ‘security profile,’ as professionals like to call it, is challenging,” she wrote the week after the attack on the Capitol. “Any former president is by definition of a target and presents some risk. But former President Trump, even before the events of last week, may be unusually vulnerable to bad actors with bad intentions. “

    Latest articles

    Related articles