threaten to In this way Federal Bureau of Investigation on parents who dare to protest Doubtful mask mandate, or denying our children the schools we pay for in Critical Race Theory (CRT) – Racial Marxism – is the logical act of a ruling regime that has abandoned even the slightest pretense of representative government.
Legalizing the National School Board Association (NSBA) Call Chasing such parents as domestic terrorists betrays the sluggish, authoritarian core of the ruling regime.
Totalitarian regimes classify dissent as domestic extremism and, under the guise of public health and/or public safety, prey on dissidents full force of the national security system.
The national security apparatus acts as a protector of the ruling regime, not as a protector of those from whom, in a free society, the law derives its just authority.
It works in Communist China. The “People’s Liberation Army” is the army of the Communist Party of China, not the army of the people.
It operates in America under President Joe Biden, the ruling class avatar. The Biden administration has turned the national security apparatus against citizens who question everything from draconian coronavirus policies to electoral integrity to, now, the CRT. It increasingly exists to protect the Biden administration, not our freedom and justice.
regarded by critics as a threat”our democracy, “A euphemism for the regime which it invokes to justify its own governance. By a threat to democracy, governance means a threat to its control over almost every aspect of society under the guise of a pandemic; voting For its control over the system; its control over what your children learn in school, therefore, critics must be bullied to keep quiet.
The ruling class has resorted to the use of coercion over persuasion because it has experienced something in its collective conscience that presupposes a near-death experience. Tens of millions of Americans showed they rejected ruling class conservatism, and twice questioned its legitimacy by voting for Donald Trump.
These erroneous thinkers who had the courage to challenge their authority, privilege and prestige could no longer be mocked or argued with.
He had to be brought on heel. The executive branch that once trained its sights on Trump will now turn to targeting the people he represented.
For many years, the national security and law enforcement establishment exaggerated the idea that racially or ethnically motivated—oranti-government / anti-incumbency“-“domestic violent extremists” posed a serious threat to the homeland.
These words were always vague and undefined. The size, scope and strength of the threat are rarely detailed.
Liberal actors would define domestic extremism liberally.
For a progressive Democratic Party that views conservatives as violent extremists, and for its national security apparatus that treats violent extremists Biggest domestic terrorist threat, January 6 provided imagery to justify the idea that the person who expressed this danger was a hideous, troglodytic, MAGA monster, and that the threat was to kill.
The thoughts of the scandalous were no longer merely dangerous. The scandalous themselves were dangerous. Violent cadres of Capitol disbanders, branded as rebels, traitors and domestic terrorists – a small fraction of the generally peaceful thousands who came to Washington to make their voices heard that day – have been met by 74 million Trump voters nationwide. be considered as a representative.
January 6th through its national strategy to combat domestic terrorism will prove the fundamental phenomenon the Biden administration used to falsify the entire society’s war.
As noted in an earlier excerpt in these pages, the strategy itself makes the CRT an integral part of that counter-terrorism strategy. “[T]Recognizing the longstanding threat posed by domestic terrorism,” the National Strategy document reads, “prioritizing efforts to ensure that … would involve rooting out.
Why would parents who challenge the teaching of a preferred ideology of governance in public schools expect to avoid this purgatory?
These parents are a threat not because they are violent, but because the school is the mechanism by which the regime creates its next generation of voters. That project is threatened by increased parental involvement in curriculum-making. more participation, Period, threatens that project – GD forbid we know what’s going on in our schools.
There is also the matter of politics. The CRT has created a backlash, resulting in anti-CRT legislation and voter awakening. It cannot be tolerated by the regime—no less by an attorney general in Merrick Garland, who appears to be a potential major conflict of interest. The NSBA letter provided an excuse for the regime to silence dissidents with its chosen course and, ultimately, intimidate submissions.
We know that the threat of violence has been exaggerated by the NSBA letter itself. The FBI lists zero instances of “harassment, intimidation and threats of violence” to which it is responding, but as the American Enterprise Institute’s Max Eden chronicles GranthshalaFlags incidents including “spreading misinformation” in prank calls, meetings and groups regarding NSBA, CRT and COVID-19 policies.
The NSBA justifies seeking help from the FBI, Department of Homeland Security and Secret Service, citing all two arrests—just to name a few agencies—to pursue threats under the Patriot Act and several other laws: a in which one illinois man allegedly indulging in disorderly conduct at a meeting and, while school officials tried to escort him out, hit an officer; and another in which a Virginia Mann Allegedly someone physically threatened and then “continued to be disorderly with the deputy” and resisted arrest.
This Is domestic terrorism worthy of being pursued with the full force of the federal government—two arrests revealing the type of conduct between overzealous parents at a Little League baseball game?
In this, there is a parallel to January 6, which was used to justify a holistic attack against dissidents from the ruling regime – under which this latest effort appears to have failed.
Similarly, 6 January has been adopted as domestic terrorism on shaky grounds.
Officials told us the Capitol breach was a murderous, coordinated, armed “rebellion.”
in that narrative Collapsed, and prosecutors have pressured to make up their own cases—cases that involve allegations of excessive trespassing. No one was killed by a protester on 6 January – the only person killed during the breach was Ashley Babitt, a protester who was shot and killed. Capitol Police. There was no plan to attack the Capitol, the FBI has suggestedhandjob similar With the disclosure of at least one of its informants. No Capitol riot defendants have been charged with carrying firearms during the Capitol breach. Neither defendant has been charged with rebellion nor sedition.
This One of the largest—and most complicated—cases in Justice Department history justified—and largely involved—pre-trial detentions of non-criminals allegedly held in solitary confinement, and some allegedly abused, on the charges not implemented before In cases like them?
Over the past two years, we have seen a historic increase in homicides disproportionately in progressive cities. Thousands have died, the FBI is largely silent.
These are the real threats our country faces that have resulted in real devastation, as well as threats promoted by the authorities to the extent that nothing – such as the alleged Biggest domestic terrorist threat of white supremacy.
Domestic terror on America’s streets has often been unproven, and overlooked, by law-enforcement agencies chasing the likes of QAnon Shaman, and now threatening to chase his next-door neighbor to the ends of the earth.
Violence of any kind cannot be tolerated in America. But neither can the selective application of justice on political grounds or, worse yet, its weaponization against political opponents.
that the Biden administration is complicit in the latter proves once again the projection of our ruling class, which shouted totalitarianism Working in more authoritarian ways for four years, once again fully controlling the levers of power.
Ben Weingarten is a Senior Fellow at the London Center for Policy Research, a Fellow at the Claremont Institute, and a Senior Contributor federalist. He . is the author of American Ingress: Ilhan Omar and the Progressive-Islamist Takeover of the Democratic Party (Bombardier, 2020). Ben is the founder and CEO of media consulting and production company Changeup Media LLC. subscribe to his newsletter bit.ly/bhwnews, and follow him on Twitter: @bhweingarten.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author.