Pitt and Jolie married in 2014 in a super-secret ceremony, which was attended by only six of their children.
Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s divorce was finalized in 2019, according to a court filing obtained by Granthshala News, but the former couple is still at odds over a lavish estate they co-own in France.
The complaint, which was filed in Luxembourg on Tuesday, alleges the 46-year-old “Maleficent” star allegedly made Pitt, 57, her first choice to buy.
The vast assets are owned by separate limited liability corporations, which control both sides, according to court papers which state that Miraval is owned by Quimicalum – a company Pitt originally owned his company. The 60% stake was held through Mondo Bongo. Meanwhile, while Jolie owns a 40% stake through her company Nouvel.
“It is worth mentioning that, for the last four years, Nouveli [Jolie’s company] did not act in the best interest of Quimcom by systematically delaying the approval and renewal of the Managerial Accounts,” the suit states.
Angelina Jolie says she didn’t decide to divorce Brad Pitt ‘lightly’: ‘I can’t say much’
“We understand that behind this systematic interruption, Nouvel and its shareholders have a real purpose [Jolie] to sell its stake in Chateau Miraval S.A. in a manner that would impede Mondo Bongo’s right of first refusal (as provided in Quimicum’s articles of approval), resulting in a capital gain for Mondo Bongo’s investment picked up and for which Novell did not contribute.”
Pitt and Jolie married in 2014 in a super secret ceremony, which was attended by only six of their children. Documents show that three years before the ball got rolling on their divorce proceedings, Pitt transferred 10% of his share to Jolie in a move that made him a 50/50 co-owner in the nine-figure landmark. .
Court disqualifies judge in Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt divorce case
Sources told Granthshala News on Tuesday that Jolie’s alleged dealings with the property are the actress’ attempt to move the goalposts and evade her obligations to Pitt as the parties reportedly agreed to give the other the option to buy the property, One of them should decide they wanted out of the system.
Meanwhile, Jolie’s camp is finger pointing For allegedly using his celebrity to garner sympathy in the ongoing custody battle of the former.
Jolie’s lawyers told Page Six on Tuesday, “Such gamesmanship, a last-ditch effort by a celebrity plaintiff seeking special treatment, does not make up for the limited review resources of this Court.”
His lawyer said, “There is nothing to look at or review here. There is no issue that meets the rigorous standards of this court or deserves review.”
Brad Pitt files for review in custody battle with Angelina Jolie after private judge’s disqualification
Jolie filed for divorce in August 2016 citing “irreconcilable differences” and requested primary custody of five of their six children: Pax, 17, Zahara, 16, Shiloh, 15, and twins Vivienne and Knox, 13. . The former couple ‘s son Maddox is now 20 .
Earlier this month, Pitt filed for review in his custody battle after Jolie won with the disqualification of a private judge who was overseeing her case.
In a statement to Granthshala News at the time, Pitt’s attorney, Theodore J. Boutras Jr. said: “We are seeking review in the California Supreme Court because the provisional judge, who was appointed by both parties and repeatedly renewed, was inappropriate. One with multiple witnesses and experts After a lengthy legal process, he was disqualified after a detailed, fact-based custody decision was provided.
“The lower court’s ruling will reward parties who are losing child custody cases, and will condemn their sportsmanship by allowing them to wait and see about the likely direction of the case before seeking the judge’s disqualification. Condemns such strategic use by unnecessarily prolonging the resolution of these disputes in an already overly cumbersome court system, challenging the ‘lie in waiting’ disqualification challenge to both the children and families involved in this case and other families in other cases. The strategy would deprive parents of irreparable time with their children as judges disqualify for trivial reasons in the middle of their cases.
Brad Pitt wins joint custody of children in Angelina Jolie divorce case
“The lower court ruling is bad for children and bad for California’s overburdened judicial system,” concluded Boutras Jr. of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
Jolie’s lawyers did not immediately return Granthshala News’ request for comment, but in a statement at the time, the actress’ attorney, Robert A. Olson told Entertainment Tonight: “The Court of Appeals unanimously refused to tolerate the moral breach of the private. The judge who had heard the custody cases, and rightly vacated that judge’s orders.
“Mr. Pitt’s lawyer’s plea to the California Supreme Court demonstrates how he clings to this private judge who displayed bias and refused statutorily required evidence. It is disturbing that in full knowledge of the unethical behavior , and previously failed to disclose his new and ongoing financial ties with him, Mr. Pitt’s attorney will seek reinstatement of the private judge.
“Ms Jolie hopes that Mr Pitt will instead join her in focusing on the needs, voices and treatment of children,” the statement concluded.
A representative for Jolie did not immediately respond to Granthshala News’ request for comment.
Granthshala News’ Melissa Roberto contributed to this report.