The judge is considering whether the tycoon should be granted bail on the security charge in the judgment set for instance.
Hong Kong tycoon and pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai has been returned from custody on Monday, while the region’s supreme court considers whether those facing national security charges face widespread challenge to Hong Kong’s new national security law Should be eligible for bail.
On December 11, Lai, a prominent critic of the Communist Party of Beijing, was accused of violating the new security law by alleged collusion with foreign powers and endangering national security.
After a full day of deliberations, the five judges in the Court of Final Appeals failed to arrive at a verdict and said they would issue the verdict at a later date.
The case can be closely watched as the high-profile and precedent of 73-year-old Lai, and whether a person facing national security charges can grant bail.
“Today’s appeal is very important. The National Security Law overruns and outlines many of the basic principles outlining Hong Kong’s common law system, including Johnny Patterson, policy director of the Hong Kong Watch in Britain.
“The decision will set an example for how the National Security Act would fit into the city’s broader legal framework. Hong Kong’s Bill of Rights guarantees bail for non-violent offenses. It is important that this theory is correct. “
Government broadcaster RTHK reported that prosecutors argued that the “default position” was that until they could prove that they were not “endangering national security,” public broadcaster RTHK said that until They cannot bail.
Lai was initially denied bail, but the verdict was overturned in the High Court, where the judge allowed Lai $ 1.3m bail on a set of stricter conditions in which he could hand in his home and his passport. Was limited to The prosecution appealed that decision to the region’s highest court, and Lai was returned to prison after the prosecution contended that he still posed a threat.
Supporters created ruckus in court
Before the hearing on Monday morning, supporters and opponents alike gathered in a long queue outside the bypoll-era court to secure one of the 50 seats reserved in the public gallery.
They included Cardinal Joseph Zen, a former bishop of Hong Kong and a staunch critic of the Communist Party of China who, according to video footage, was caught as a “dog” and “traitor” by pro-establishment protesters.
Lee and two of his officers also face separate charges for fraud for allegedly using their company NEXT Digital’s establishment, the publisher of the anti-installation newspaper Apple Daily, among other reasons stated in the lease.
Monday’s bail hearing was the first case under Hong Kong’s new Chief Justice Andrew Cheung.
His predecessor, Geoffrey Ma, blamed many democracy activists such as Joshua Wong in 2014 for his role in the last wave of Hong Kong protests.
The Court of Final Appeal is the supreme court of Hong Kong and foreign judges of other common law courts usually sit on the bench. In cases involving national security law, Chief Executive Officer Carrie Lam should first clarify to the judges, but Ma and others sought to insist that it is the judiciary rather than Lam who decides which ones What matters do the judges preside over.
London-based criminal barrister David Perry was originally asked to stand trial against Lai but he withdrew from the case following a public uproar in the United Kingdom and was replaced by a local barrister.
Lae’s trial is scheduled to begin in April.