- Advertisement -

Seeking meeting with NAACP Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg After a Whistleblower Claimed That social media The giant is not adequately controlling hate speech on its platform.

“Vaccine hesitancy, political violence and white supremacy are rampant,” NAACP President and CEO Derrick Johnson said in a statement. bloomberg. “Taking profit on hate and propaganda is sick and bad.”


After meeting with Zuckerberg last year about hate speech on Facebook, the meeting was criticized by the NAACP and other civil rights groups.

“We urged Mark Zuckerberg to address these issues a year ago, but in our meeting, he danced around the seriousness of his company’s failures, showing no interest in taking action,” Johnson said at the time.

- Advertisement -

“We have since experienced an insurgency, election propaganda brainwashed a significant part of the country, and COVID lies are spreading as fast as new forms are.”

Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen recently released a trove of internal documents detailing how the company handles content. Other topics include internal conversations about the mental health toll the Instagram app takes on young girls, as well as the double standard Facebook maintains for celebrity accounts.

Whistleblower says Facebook is a US ‘national security issue’

Haughan, testifying before Congress on Tuesday, alleged that Facebook was a “national security issue“to the United States.

In his opening statement, Haugen said: “The choices being made inside Facebook are disastrous for our children, for our public safety, for our privacy and for our democracy. I have seen Facebook time and time again to its advantage and faces a conflict between our defenses.”

“Facebook consistently resolved these conflicts in favor of its profits,” he said.

Get Granthshala Business on the go by clicking here

Facebook has claimed that less than 1% of the content on the platform is hate speech.

Facebook’s director of policy communications, Lena Pietsch, said Haugen “worked for the company for less than two years, had no direct reports, never participated in decision-point meetings with C-level executives — and that this Testified more than six times for not working on the subject in question.”