Opinion: The January 6 hearings must go on

- Advertisement -

The Speaker has said that “unless something else develops, this hearing is the final hearing at this point. But it is not in stone as things happen.” Thompson said this week he hopes to arrive “people in the middle,
The committee is expected to complete a report by the end of the year and before the next Congress begins. thompson Told That there may be an interim report before the medium term.

But making it the final hearing would be a big mistake. The committee should hold more hearings, including primetime in October and November, before releasing the final report.

- Advertisement -

The country desperately needs to know more about the effort to reverse the 2020 election, and that education must take place on a public platform. As the mid-term elections draw closer, and even after they are done, it is imperative that the committee keep this inquiry front and center.

At the heart of its findings are the Trump administration as well as several Republican elected officials participating in a deliberate and well-planned effort to reverse the 2020 presidential election.

If the committee does not continue its findings on television, it is likely that many voters will move on from this historic story. With the turbulent economy that everyone faces, as well as the raging culture wars that are unfolding over issues like immigration and education, the context in and around January 6th can quickly fade.

The campaign of some Republican members to overturn the legitimate results of the election is not just a story among many – it is the story of our times. Historically, it was unique, without precedent. These hardline conservatives did almost everything possible, including inciting mob violence against the Congress and the Vice President (members of the same party) to keep the losing candidate in power.

The fact that this happened should be a big red flag for the health of our democracy. Democratic and Republican voters should agree on this. When one party will not accept defeat, and the responsible party continues to run candidates for office who refuse elections, including the secretary of state who will handle these matters in 2024, we all have one in our hands. Big problem.

In its work so far, the bipartisan January 6 committee has done a commendable job of making public the shocking revelations about the rebellion and helping to piece together its various pieces into a coherent narrative.

- Advertisement -

This is no easy task in our age of fragmented media consumption and propaganda. Despite what we know about former President Donald Trump’s efforts to stay in power, backed by several top Republican officials, the committee showed that January 6th was more shocking than we previously understood.

The committee’s most tangible strength has come from the hearings it has held in public. As former ABC News producer Jack Goldstone, Thompson and his vice president, who are soon consulting with former Republican Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming, figure out how to make the presentation dramatic, legible, and coherent for a nation that doesn’t care. It is used to consume information through visual media.

Committee members are looking at how to communicate discoveries in a legible and compelling way. Each hearing told a new part of the story and introduced the country to lesser-known figures in the administration who witnessed the instability experienced by our democracy in those months. Each hearing was important not only to reveal what happened, but also to address the risks of future elections unless there is reform and accountability.

By uncovering the truth, the committee has achieved what some of the most effective investigations Congress has been able to do in the past. When we think about why some congressional committees, such as the Watergate Committee in 1973, were so powerful, it is because they were able to force the public to grapple with evidence of wrongdoing at the highest levels of power.

When Sen. Sam Erwin of North Carolina drew the public to his television screen more than 51 days In “gavel-to-gavel” coverage, he ensured that voters could not shy away from the hard realities that were exposed about top officials abusing their power.
The committee will hear on 6 January, 28 September, the chairman said
According to columnist Jack Anderson in July 1973, three out of four American homes had their on-screen hearings at some point “proving a television viewing event“Ervin, by a wire service“Poised to become an authentic American folk hero.”
Of course, televised congressional hearings can also be disastrous. They can appeal to sensation, and they can become a stage for controversy and partisan warfare. There are many such examples, such as the Benghazi trial in 2015, which ended to allay the worst fears of what would happen when Congress and the media unite.

But there are other moments, such as the Watergate and January 6 committees, where the results have been powerful and the health of the nation has benefited. These hearings have helped voters better understand Washington’s inner workings, they have exposed wrongdoing and abuses of power, they have coherent pieces of stories, and they have forced the public to reflect on those issues. which did not directly affect his pocketbook.

The danger of the January 6 committee now stalling is that, for better or worse, the lengthy committee report usually doesn’t get the same attention as television politics. They get lost in the media frenzy very quickly. Many voters, who are now most comfortable reading their news on Twitter, Instagram and TikTok, will not have the patience to sort through the content. And as then-Attorney General Bill Barr showed with his summary of the Mueller Report in March 2019, they are all too easy to be perverted by opponents who are savvy in public relations in our current media environment.

Congress cannot allow this to happen. While the role of the January 6 committee is not to push voters into one partisan camp or the other, Thompson, Cheney and their colleagues have an obligation to do what they can to make sure that when voters turn up this November. When they cast their vote, they know what they are voting for, what candidates are willing to do to seek power. When candidates refuse elections, the public must clearly understand the real consequences that can come from such rhetoric.

We are at a turning point with our democracy. While the campaign to reverse the election failed, Republicans who followed this strategy came exceptionally close to victory – and they engaged in dangerous violence along the way.

It should be in the mind of every voter as they decide what kind of people they want to lead this country in future. And after the midterms are up, our elected officials must make sure voters keep wondering what happened as the nation begins to turn its attention to the next presidential election.

Credit : www.cnn.com

- Advertisement -

Recent Articles

Related Stories