Supreme Court Will Hear Dispute Over North Carolina Voter ID Law

- Advertisement -


The state’s GOP-controlled legislature claims Democratic leaders are failing to adequately defend the law, so they want to do so themselves.

- Advertisement -

America Supreme court announced on Wednesday that will listen a case that North Carolina Republican State’s Voter ID Act has brought the right to protect.

The law in question was passed in 2018 and requires that everyone in North Carolina have a photo ID to vote. State Chapters NAACP Immediately challenged this, saying that such a condition disproportionately impacts Black and Latinx voters.

Since then, Republican lawmakers in the state have filed complaints that Gov. Roy Cooper and State Attorney General Joshua Stein Democrats has not adequately defended the law against such legal challenges. The lawmakers sought to intervene in the defense against the NAACP lawsuit. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that they could not step in the GOP-controlled legislature. Asked Supreme Court to consider demands in August.

- Advertisement -

In their request, the lawmakers cited the governor’s opposition to the law, which they vetoed only for the legislature to overturn its decision.

Voter ID cards greet voters in Ruckersville, Virginia, on Election Day last November. The US Supreme Court announced Wednesday that it will hear a case over the right to protect voter identification law in North Carolina.
Bill Clark via Getty Images

“In their veto statement, they alleged that the bill is of ‘horrendous and cynical origin’ and was ‘designed to suppress the rights of minority, poor and elderly voters,'” the lawmakers wrote, noting that Cooper and Stein were a fair representation of the state. are doing .

The questions presented by the case “strike at the heart of the sovereign authority of a state to nominate agents to represent its interests in court,” the request continued. “And as this case demonstrates, they are of particular importance in the context of a divided government and litigation involving contentious matters.”

stein filed a reaction The court asked not to take up the matter, saying that the state is already defending the law adequately and since such issues arise so frequently, the intervention of the Supreme Court is not justified.

voter id law have become one of the most controversial issues around fair election In recent years when GOP-controlled states began to intensify such restrictions. Democrats broadly say they are a tool of voter suppression (though studies suggest the effect may be at least) and indicate research that shows Voter ID laws do little to tackle voter fraud (which is already extremely rare).

It is expected that the Supreme Court will hear the arguments in the matter by next summer and give its verdict.

,

- Advertisement -
Mail Us For  DMCA / Credit  Notice

Recent Articles

Stay on top - Get the daily news in your inbox

Related Stories