According to the Recording Academy spokesperson, Taylor Swift’s re-recorded album will be eligible for the future Grammy Awards.

Swifties were overjoyed to learn earlier this month that the “Evermore” singer officially re-recorded one of her early albums, “Fearless”, which grossed a total of four songs, including the first-year album and Best Country Album Live

Since then, a Recording Academy spokesperson has confirmed that some of his new recordings will be eligible for the awards.

A spokesman for the Recording Academy stated, “The current eligibility guidelines allow new performances and albums to be eligible if they were recorded within the last five years. However, none of the older songs are eligible for the songwriting award Will happen.” Board.

Taylor Swift Announcements has again produced a ‘new’ version with a new version which is coming at midnight.

A recording academy spokesman Taylor Swift's upcoming recorded album and performance will be eligible for a future Grammy Award

A recording academy spokesman Taylor Swift’s upcoming recorded album and performance will be eligible for a future Grammy Award

In November, it was confirmed that the award-winning artist could re-record his first five albums, including “Taylor Swift,” “Fearless,” “Speak Now,” “Red” and “1989”. The revelation was followed by the revelation that producer / manager Scooter Braun bought the rights to Swift’s records that he created with his former label Big Machine Records when he acquired the company in 2019 for $ 300 million. She Left the label in 2018.

Word of Swift’s renewed Grammy eligibility made its way to Twitter on Tuesday, increasing the weight of most users, prompting Swift loyalists to defend her.

Most of the uproar over Swift’s new award eligibility has been worrying that the pop star is “greedy” and will take away from other musicians who deserve equal attention to Grammys.

“Okay, but he already owns the villager he won for them, so it’s stupid to allow him to freeze once again” Criticism On twitter

Taylor Swift worked for ‘Park’ of the same name

“The refusal does not make it an effort, but it is still primarily the music she has won awards for in the past, as long as she does not win anything for each song she releases. I especially like her I’m not trying to discredit, I think it’s a redundant rule. Grammatically, “one more person Continuous.

Twitter users reacted to the news with mixed criticism, with most people describing the pop star as 'greedy'.

Twitter users reacted to the news with mixed criticism, with most people describing the pop star as ‘greedy’.
(Photo by Rick Scooty / Revision / AP)

“Calling Bulls – Tee On This – Sorry No- Once You Get Around For A Grammy Per Song. GTFOH – @ taylorswift13, “one more User slammed the singer.

“Tired of her winning prizes. Can we give someone else a chance,” another Reacted, “We all know that the Grammys are corrupt.”

One man mocked Grammys as “scamis” and claimed he favored a “special set” of artists.

Some fans insisted that Swift’s new recording would lead to a Grammy victory in the future if she submitted her upcoming albums.

“If she seriously reintroduced those albums, this greedy s – t Ive must have seen her,” one person wrote Of possibility.

“Constant attention, greed for recognition and it drives up sales. Just my personal opinion and I’m not going to discuss that and IDC any further if it’s not the first one. I don’t like that others like her. Did it before. The concept to me is greedy. No matter who does what, “a fan slammed.

Billboard noted that Swift would not be the first musician to submit a re-recording for the idea of ​​the award. Frank Sinatra and Nat King Cole are two legendary artists whose re-recordings of previous albums nominated them. Although the outlet claims voters “generally favor new projects that reflect the glories of the past.”

In response to the Nifters, Swift’s fanbase leapt to her rescue.

“I doubt she cares about a Grammy. I’m glad she is finally enabling herself in her albums,” a fan Tweeted.

Tim MCGRAW was ‘a little man’ when Taylor Swift named him but his son left him

Another twitter user Argued: “Other people have won the Grammys again with the recording, so it would be stupid if others were not allowed to do the same in another way.” But that reaction caused a negative reaction from another account wrote: “Others should also not be allowed.”

“Then join the Grami Samiti and make rules,” another Clapped back.

“y’all what if taylor becomes the first woman to win a Grammy for a 3-year-old album. Think about it.” #Taylor Swift #Swifty #FearlessTaylorsVersion #gram, “From a fan frolic said.

Lol What’s greedy about submitting something to a Grammy? She Nothing is gained except recognition. And if she submits, she won’t be the first to do it or win by reacarding. ” Defended another.

“She’s giving new unrelated music to her old albums, it’s not like she’s just presenting old work that we’ve all heard to recognize and admire the new songs that come with her old albums How to try? ” Second account said.

Click here to sign up for our entertainment news

On Thursday, the 31-year-old singer made the surprise announcement that she would soon be releasing her “Fearless” album. That night, she dropped the new version of the song “Love Story” from the album.

“Good Morning America, this is Taylor. I am very excited to share tonight with you. I will be putting out a version of my song ‘Love Story’ tonight, which was originally on my album ‘Fearless’.” a .

Swift stated that their new version of “Fearless” would be different from the original album, with six new songs never heard before.

“I’ve gone back now and recorded those so that everyone not only listened to the albums that had made the album but the songs were almost made. Full picture!” he said.

A representative for the Recording Academy did not immediately respond to Granthshala News’ request for comment.