‘A big critic made 20 months and a new president, @washingtonpost,’ a critic reacted
The Washington Post raised eyebrows on Monday night for a report on the first newly-opened “migrant facility for children” under President Biden, which critics pushed during the Trump administration, compared to the “children in the cage” mantra.
According to information posted from Cariso Springs, Texas, dozens of migrant teenagers boarded a van on a dusty road to a former man’s camp for oilfield workers on Monday. “The emergency facility – a vestige of the Trump administration that was open for only one month in summer 2019 – is being reactivated to keep 700 children between the ages of 13 and 17.”
Media attention to bring CRUZ Vacation “Scandal” for cube power-ups going out of the house during the new era
The post continued, “Government officials say the camp is needed because facilities for migrant children have to be cut by almost half due to the coronovirus epidemic. At the same time, the number of unaccompanied children crossing the border has increased. January The overall highest report – more than 5,700 apprehensions – for that month in recent years. “
The headline, which reads “The first migrant facility for children opens under Biden,” appeared far more charitable than the coverage given to former President Trump, especially during the 2018 migrant crisis when the administration raised its child among migrant families Implemented the separation policy.
The 2018 headline included, “The American tradition of raising children,” and “The real reason we are caging children.”
In 2019, the Post ran a story titled, “The US Border Cell is seen as a ‘cage’, with Central American authorities pledging more immigration cooperation.”
Even as recently as September 2020, the Post Editorial Board wrote, “The tableau of migrant children torn by presidential policies must be one of the most enduring images produced by presidential policies” in which Trump’s immigration There was a warning about the agenda. Will take another word.
The Washington Post has unearthed OP-ED, which is making ‘multi-purpose’ investments to expand ‘Tropical Transport Support Emitting Ministries’.
Critics piled on the new headline on social media.
“Now what for?” Editor Daniel Foster, who contributed to the National Review, responded.
Radio host Dana Loesch said, “Children locked in cages are now ‘migratory facilities for children’.”
“Big difference makes 20 months and a new president, @washingtonpost,” wrote author Drew Holden, comparing the headline to a “cage” headline under Trump.
Even progressivists peered through the water below the post.
New York Democrat Lindsey Boyfriend wrote, “There are too many inflammatory and criminal things on our corridor side too.”
“Definitely voted for all of us,” Progress Everywhere has tweeted Jordan Zakarian sarcastically.
“Expansion of concentration camp under a Democrat administration,” activist Sema Hernández warned.
The Post did not immediately respond to Granthshala News’ request for comment.
CBS News ran a similar headline on Monday, stating, “As the border crosses, maximum capacity increases in US shelters for migrant children,” although it received far less attention than the Post.